Can’t take my eyes off of you: State of viewability

22 December 2015

Digital ad buyers and sellers have undergone a sometimes painful but necessary transition toward using viewable impressions as currency.
The shift from a served impression to a viewable impression is yet another step to greater accountability in digital media. Viewability is a big issue in display advertising. Publishers willing to be held to this standard will also need to demonstrate that their viewable inventory has been undervalued because its effectiveness has been systematically understated by the non-viewable ads.

In March of 2015, comScore released a report showing that display ad viewability rates did not budge between 2013 and 2014, remaining at 46 percent thoughout.

Ad Viewability

Quite simmilar situation is in Europe. The percentage of ads that are technically viewable in Europe — 50 percent viewed for longer than a second — has fallen from 63 percent in the third quarter to 58 percent in the fourth quarter of 2015, according to ad verification company Meetrics. Split out by country, Austria slipped the most, from 70 percent viewable ads to 65 percent in the quarter. In the U.K., the picture is bleaker. In the final quarter of 2015, only 50 percent of its display ads were viewable by the IAB and the Media Rating Council (MRC) standards.

Screen-Shot-2016-02-08-at-16.23.13

Source: Meetrics viewability benchmarks, Q3 & Q4 2015

In its “State of Viewability Transaction 2015” statement, the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) says that the achievement of 100 percent viewability is “unreasonable”. Longer-loading HTML5 ads means fewer are being seen as users scroll down before the ad loads. Instead an ad campaign should reach a 70 percent viewability threshold, while the industry transitions to buying and selling ads on a viewable impression basis. 

The industry standard requires that for desktop display ads to be considered viewable, 50 percent of their pixels must be in view for a minimum of one second. For desktop video the standard is 50 percent for 2 seconds. In addition, the standard stipulates that for larger desktop ad units, 30% of pixels in view for 1 second constitutes a Viewable ad. Custom ad units and important elements of sponsorships are not consistently measurable today. The measurement standard and the technology are still evolving.

Want to learn more?

    Select
    Demand
    Brand
    Agency
    DSP
    Supply
    App Developer
    Others
    Ad Network Owner
    Tech Vendor
    Other/Not Sure
    Select
    Demand
    Brand
    Agency
    Others
    Ad Network Owner
    Other/Not Sure
    Select
    Demand
    Brand
    Agency
    Supply
    Media House
    Others
    Ad Network Owner
    Tech Vendor
    Other/Not Sure
    Select
    Demand
    Brand
    Agency
    Supply
    Web Publisher
    App Developer
    SSP
    Media House
    Others
    Ad Network Owner
    Tech Vendor
    Other/Not Sure
    Select
    Supply
    Web Publisher
    App Developer
    SSP
    Media House
    Others
    Ad Network Owner
    Other/Not Sure
    Select
    Demand
    Brand
    Agency
    DSP
    Supply
    Web Publisher
    App Developer
    SSP
    Media House
    Others
    Ad Network Owner
    Tech Vendor
    Other/Not Sure
    You Might Also Like
    contextual targeting vs cookie based targeting

    The digital advertising world is on the cusp of a major upheaval. Growing privacy concerns and tightening regulations are rapidly eroding the dominance of third-party cookies, the long-standing backbone of behavioral cookie targeting. This shift is pushing advertisers towards a new frontier – contextual advertising, with header bidding platforms emerging as a crucial ally in […]

    contextual targeting vs cookie based targeting
    Contextual targeting vs Cookie Targeting

    A publisher's guide to thriving in the cookieless future. Learn how contextual targeting and header bidding maximize ad revenue while respecting privacy.

    Read more
    header bidding platform comparison

    Choosing the right header bidding solution is essential for maximizing ad revenue and optimizing publisher yield. This article provides a comprehensive header bidding platform comparison and comparative overview of: Admixer.HB+ Ezoic Playwire AdPushup Freestar Mediavine Raptive Key Considerations Before diving in, remember that the ideal HB solution depends on these factors: Your Publisher Needs: ad […]

    header bidding platform comparison
    Admixer.HB+ Top Header Bidding Platforms: A Competitive Analysis

    Maximize ad revenue with the right header bidding platform. This guide compares key features and demand sources of leading solutions like Admixer.HB+

    Read more
    AI in Ad tech for Header Bidding

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is fueling a revolution in advertising technology (ad tech). The integration of AI-driven solutions is fundamentally altering industry practices. Header bidding exemplifies this transformation, with AI-powered tools enhancing decision-making, boosting efficiency, and delivering superior outcomes for advertisers and publishers alike. AI-Powered Bidding Optimization Traditionally, bid management involved manual adjustments and rule-based decision-making. […]

    AI in Ad tech for Header Bidding
    The Role of AI in Ad Tech: A Header Bidding Perspective

    Discover how AI is revolutionizing advertising technology, including header bidding. Learn about optimization, fraud prevention, personalization, and the exciting future of AI in ad tech.

    Read more

      Stay updated with Admixer
      Privacy Policy